Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 24, Number 5, 2019

Estimation of radiation-induced second cancer risk associated with the institutional field matching craniospinal irradiation technique: A comparative treatment planning study

Hemalatha Athiyaman, Athiyaman Mayilvaganan, Arun Chougule, Mary Joan, Harvinder Singh Kumar

Summary:

Aim To estimate and compare the lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of radiation-induced second cancer (SC) in pediatric medulloblastoma patients planned with institutional 3D conformal field matching method, gap junction method and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). Background The epidemiological studies on childhood cancer survivors reported that long-term cancer survivors who received radiotherapy are at a significantly increased risk for the development of SC. Hence, the increased concern to predict the SC risk for long-term survivors. Materials and methods In addition to institutional field matching planning method, IMRT and gap junction methods were created for ten pediatric medulloblastoma patients. The risk estimates were made based on the site-specific cancer risk coefficient provided by the BEIR VII committee according to the organ equivalent dose for various critical organs. Also, plans were compared for target volume dose distribution and dose received by critical organs. Results When compared to the gap junction method, the IMRT and institutional field matching method were superior in normal tissue sparing and dose conformity. However, highly significant volume of low dose associated with IMRT was the main concern for the SC risk. The accumulated LAR for all the critical organs with 3D conformal gap junction and IMRT method was 23–25% while for the 3D conformal field matching method it was 21%. Conclusion The LAR associated with the institutional field matching technique was substantially lower. As this method is highly robust and easy to set up, it can be a better choice of a craniospinal irradiation technique where 3DCRT is the only choice of treatment.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2019; 24(5) : 409-420


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2