Dear Authors,
If you believe that your paper was mistakenly rejected by other leading journals and you do not agree with final decision, the editors of Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy offer new fast track review. You may submit your manuscript to Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy together with all prior peer-reviews obtained from the other journal and your rebuttal letter. We guarantee review based decision within 72 hours from the time we will receive your manuscript.

Fast track submission process: Please submit the manuscript with all reviews and rebuttal letter by email to Dr. Michal Masternak (michal.masternak@ucf.edu) for fast review processing. To assure immediate attention the email title must to include: RPOR-fast track- Last Name First Name (of corresponding author).

Volume 24, Number 2, 2019

Calculation and measurement of doses in the surface layers of a phantom when using Tomotherapy

Anna Kowalik, E. Konstanty, Tomasz Piotrowski, Malgorzata Skórska, Julian Malicki

Summary:

Background The calculation and measurement on the surface of the skin presents a significant dosimetric problem because of numerous factors which have an influence on the dose distribution in this region. Aim The overall aim of this study was to check the agreement between doses measured with thermoluminescent detectors (TLD) during tomotherapy photon beam irradiation of the skin area of a solid water cylindrical phantom with doses calculated with Hi-Art treatment planning system (TPS). Material and Method The measurements of the dose were made with the use of a solid water cylindrical phantom - Cheese Phantom. Two bolus phantoms were used: 5 mm and 10 mm Six different planning treatments were generated. The doses were measured using TL detectors. Results In the case of a tumor located near the surface of the skin, the mean dose for 0.5 cm bolus was - 1.94 Gy, and for 1 cm bolus - 2.03 Gy. For the tumor located inside the phantom and organ at risk on the same side that TL detectors, for a 0.5 cm bolus, mean dose was 0.658 Gy, and for a 1 cm bolus, 0.62 Gy. Conclusion The analysis of results showed that the relative percentage difference between measured and planned dose in the field of irradiation was less than 10%, while the largest differences were on the board of the field of radiation and outside of the field of irradiation, where the dose was 0.08 Gy to 1 Gy.

Signature: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2019; 24(2) : 251-262


« back

 
INDEXED IN:

Indexed in: EMBASE®, the Excerpta Medica database, the Elsevier BIOBASE (Current Awareness in Biological Sciences) and in the Index Copernicus.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/15071367/19/2